- Posts: 7163
- Thank you received: 21
LadyJazzer wrote:
FredHayek wrote: Word out this morning ......
Yes...."Some people say...."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It's because she's a coward... only able to hit and run.Reverend Revelant wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote:
FredHayek wrote: Word out this morning ......
Yes...."Some people say...."
Another one of Obama's foreign policies experts checks in.
I would probably go into cardiac arrest if Lady Jazzer ever jumped into one of these threads and actually wrote a debatable 3 or 4 paragraph response that was made up of her own thoughts and not some Huffington Post clip and paste or just snide ass rhetoric.
I honestly don't think she is capable of doing that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote: www.nytimes.com/2014/03/02/sunday-review...type=article.......a RETROSPECTIVE glance at recent events......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It's much easier to start a debate if you lay out your argument THEN post your link to back it up. Posting a link isn't a very good way to get a debate going because your own personal interpretation was not presented. Just a thought.homeagain wrote:
homeagain wrote: www.nytimes.com/2014/03/02/sunday-review...type=article.......a RETROSPECTIVE glance at recent events......
Let me intercede here.....the above link WOULD HAVE BEEN a good debate.....non-partisan,
retrospective AND good points in general...What happened?....NOTHING, no comment, no post
no response NO DEBATE.....you (collectively) do NOT want to debate, you just want to continue
to "pile on" and present PARTISAN politics ad nauseum....JMO
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Rick wrote:
It's much easier to start a debate if you lay out your argument THEN post your link to back it up. Posting a link isn't a very good way to get a debate going because your own personal interpretation was not presented. Just a thought.homeagain wrote:
homeagain wrote: www.nytimes.com/2014/03/02/sunday-review...type=article.......a RETROSPECTIVE glance at recent events......
Let me intercede here.....the above link WOULD HAVE BEEN a good debate.....non-partisan,
retrospective AND good points in general...What happened?....NOTHING, no comment, no post
no response NO DEBATE.....you (collectively) do NOT want to debate, you just want to continue
to "pile on" and present PARTISAN politics ad nauseum....JMO
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
No offense HA, but if your POV of a subject isn't known, it's a little difficult to start a debate is it not?homeagain wrote:
From my POV, I saw it as a method to START a dialogue.....that HISTORY is a good point of
reference to view OTHER actions/statements/POTUS and just maybe come off the PARTISAN
POLITICS.....obviously I was terribly wrong in my assessment.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Just goes to show you how much actual thought goes into that award. Do you think they will rescind that nomination?Photo-fish wrote: Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize for bringing about a peaceful resolution to the Syrian-U.S. dispute over chemical weapons.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/2/russias-vladimir-putin-nominated-nobel-peace-prize/
See? We have nothing to worry about.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.