Another one of Obama's foreign policies experts checks in.
I would probably go into cardiac arrest if Lady Jazzer ever jumped into one of these threads and actually wrote a debatable 3 or 4 paragraph response that was made up of her own thoughts and not some Huffington Post clip and paste or just snide ass rhetoric.
I honestly don't think she is capable of doing that.
Another one of Obama's foreign policies experts checks in.
I would probably go into cardiac arrest if Lady Jazzer ever jumped into one of these threads and actually wrote a debatable 3 or 4 paragraph response that was made up of her own thoughts and not some Huffington Post clip and paste or just snide ass rhetoric.
I honestly don't think she is capable of doing that.
It's because she's a coward... only able to hit and run.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Let me intercede here.....the above link WOULD HAVE BEEN a good debate.....non-partisan,
retrospective AND good points in general...What happened?....NOTHING, no comment, no post
no response NO DEBATE.....you (collectively) do NOT want to debate, you just want to continue
to "pile on" and present PARTISAN politics ad nauseum....JMO
Let me intercede here.....the above link WOULD HAVE BEEN a good debate.....non-partisan,
retrospective AND good points in general...What happened?....NOTHING, no comment, no post
no response NO DEBATE.....you (collectively) do NOT want to debate, you just want to continue
to "pile on" and present PARTISAN politics ad nauseum....JMO
It's much easier to start a debate if you lay out your argument THEN post your link to back it up. Posting a link isn't a very good way to get a debate going because your own personal interpretation was not presented. Just a thought.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Let me intercede here.....the above link WOULD HAVE BEEN a good debate.....non-partisan,
retrospective AND good points in general...What happened?....NOTHING, no comment, no post
no response NO DEBATE.....you (collectively) do NOT want to debate, you just want to continue
to "pile on" and present PARTISAN politics ad nauseum....JMO
It's much easier to start a debate if you lay out your argument THEN post your link to back it up. Posting a link isn't a very good way to get a debate going because your own personal interpretation was not presented. Just a thought.
From my POV, I saw it as a method to START a dialogue.....that HISTORY is a good point of
reference to view OTHER actions/statements/POTUS and just maybe come off the PARTISAN
POLITICS.....obviously I was terribly wrong in my assessment.
homeagain wrote:
From my POV, I saw it as a method to START a dialogue.....that HISTORY is a good point of
reference to view OTHER actions/statements/POTUS and just maybe come off the PARTISAN
POLITICS.....obviously I was terribly wrong in my assessment.
No offense HA, but if your POV of a subject isn't known, it's a little difficult to start a debate is it not?
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
Just goes to show you how much actual thought goes into that award. Do you think they will rescind that nomination?
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
It is actually pretty easy to nominate someone for a Nobel Peace Prize so I don't hold much stock in this. Probably just some of Vlad's drinking buddies submitting an application.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
