Russia might invade Ukraine if Obama wins

28 Feb 2014 19:11 #1 by Reverend Revelant

Russia might invade Ukraine if Obama wins, Palin warns
BY BLAKE HOUNSHELL OCTOBER 22, 2008 - 09:09 AM

Speaking Tuesday at a rally in a Reno, Nevada, Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin had a little fun with her counterpart on the Democratic ticket, thanking Joe Biden for warning Barack Obama's supporters to "gird your loins" for an international crisis if the Illinois senator wins.

Palin helpfully offered four scenarios for such a crisis, one of which was this strange one:
After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.

As we've said before, this is an extremely far-fetched scenario. And given how Russia has been able to unsettle Ukraine's pro-Western government without firing a shot, I don't see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel. Watch the upcoming parliamentary elections in December to see if Moscow gets the pliable new government it wants.

http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/200 ... alin_warns


What does a hick from Alaska know about foreign policy? Stupid woman. :sarcasm:

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 19:33 #2 by Blazer Bob

Reverend Revelant wrote:

Russia might invade Ukraine if Obama wins, Palin warns
BY BLAKE HOUNSHELL OCTOBER 22, 2008 - 09:09 AM

Speaking Tuesday at a rally in a Reno, Nevada, Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin had a little fun with her counterpart on the Democratic ticket, thanking Joe Biden for warning Barack Obama's supporters to "gird your loins" for an international crisis if the Illinois senator wins.

Palin helpfully offered four scenarios for such a crisis, one of which was this strange one:
After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.

As we've said before, this is an extremely far-fetched scenario. And given how Russia has been able to unsettle Ukraine's pro-Western government without firing a shot, I don't see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel. Watch the upcoming parliamentary elections in December to see if Moscow gets the pliable new government it wants.

http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/200 ... alin_warns


What does a hick from Alaska know about foreign policy? Stupid woman. :sarcasm:


But but but, she saw Russia from her porch.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 20:52 #3 by Rick
And all of Obama's sheep predicted we would be more loved and respected by the rest of the world under Obama's magical leadership. Wrong on all counts.

“We can’t afford four more years of this”

Tim Walz

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 20:58 #4 by Blazer Bob

Rick wrote: And all of Obama's sheep predicted we would be more loved and respected by the rest of the world under Obama's magical leadership. Wrong on all counts.




doesn't matter. It is good intentions that count.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 21:13 #5 by Blazer Bob
"RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE, OBAMA DECLARES HAPPY HOUR"


http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... y-hour.php

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 21:14 #6 by Rick
We could have sent Richard Simmons over there with his short shorts and sparkling tank top and gotten the same amount of respect as Hillary and her stupid plastic button. These idiots have done their very best to make us look weak in the eyes of leaders who only respect strength. Reagan rolling in his grave.

“We can’t afford four more years of this”

Tim Walz

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 21:18 #7 by Rick

BlazerBob wrote: "RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE, OBAMA DECLARES HAPPY HOUR"


http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2 ... y-hour.php

After issuing stern warnings to Russia not to invade Crimea, the administration, confronted with the actual presence of Russian troops on the ground, philosophized about whether it was really an invasion, suggesting that a more apt term might be an “uncontested arrival.” Former chess champion Garry Kasparov reacted with stunned indignation


:Confused: :banghead: :LMAO:

“We can’t afford four more years of this”

Tim Walz

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 21:40 #8 by FredHayek
Uncontested Arrival? Newspeak is here!

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 22:02 #9 by archer
And you would like us to do what? Attack Russia? Send troops to Ukraine? Yeah, that worked so well for us in Iraq and Afghanistan...... Nothing makes us feel so good as Republicans on the war path.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Feb 2014 22:07 #10 by Blazer Bob

FredHayek wrote: Uncontested Arrival? Newspeak is here!


It's been around awhile.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44VOdimO93g

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.166 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+