Third Western governor to quit, Hick, Inslee and never mind the Bullocks!
Billionaire Styer just qualified for the December debates. He will be the 7th on stage.
Bloomberg, owner of a vast media empire, has said his company will still report on Trump but won't cover him or his opponents in the Democrat Primary. Should he instead temporarily divest his media empire while he is running?
Meanwhile the "No Malarky" Joe Biden tour continues. Joe's wife Jill appears to have recovered from the bite she received on stage...from her own husband. He talked about children in the pool noticing his hairy legs during an important policy speech about roaches.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
does NOT surprise me, after the scathing sentiment from one of her "team"......I lost count...
how many are left now?......got to get DOWN to several serious individuals,before I can make an informed decision.
And then there were Six. Only six candidates so far are eligible for the December Democrat Debate. Only white people so far. Why are people of color having a hard time making the debate stage? Because Democrat voters in Iowa and New Hampshire don't like minorities?
I doubt it. Barack Obama did very well in Iowa 12 years ago.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
ramage wrote: HA,
Please define your interpretation of "serious". Is Michael Bennet serious? Is Joe Biden serious?
NO one has presented a wise and workable plan....(.for the national debt nor for the inequality
I spoke of in another thread)......until a concrete plan (which will include many sacrifices from both parties) is presented in a clear and concise way....I do not see a serious contender.
Now that the field is down to a half dozen, I might watch the debates to see if someone will
address those items with a workable solution.
As we speak, isn't Biden bickering with another? (inconsequential in it's content)....GET SERIOUS.
You can take it to the bank that Booker will be on the dais. Even if they have to use a poll in NJ. BTW, does being 1/1024th% indigenous count as being of color? If so Warren fits that slot, but don't forget Castro, maybe Bloomberg will slip him some money to remain in the running.
ramage wrote: HA,
I know that you like to spin many threads (pun). However, let us stick to the topic above. What is the inequality to which you are referring?
[/b]
First rule of self awareness is this......be situational aware of your surroundings. Apparently the
plight of many americans is NOT within your field of vision..... blindness is NOT becoming jmo