After debate, the democrat party can not accuse the republicans of being the party of doddering old white millionaires who dodged the draft. They made a mistake in not allowing Tulsi Gabbard to participate. It would have meant that Bernie and Joe would not have had to speak so long , expose themselves and Tulsi would have provided a youthful female of color (relatively speaking) for the audience to watch. Her ideas are not out of line with most of Joe and Bernie's positions.
The "pieces de resistance "of the debate: Biden coughing into this hand and Bernie sneezing then wiping his nose. Both of them have NOT been tested; because as they said they are asymptomatic.
ramage wrote: After debate, the democrat party can not accuse the republicans of being the party of doddering old white millionaires who dodged the draft. They made a mistake in not allowing Tulsi Gabbard to participate. It would have meant that Bernie and Joe would not have had to speak so long , expose themselves and Tulsi would have provided a youthful female of color (relatively speaking) for the audience to watch. Her ideas are not out of line with most of Joe and Bernie's positions.
I agree with your post but take issue with the term “female of color”. I know it’s the new politically correct term, but it really grates me. Every person, living or dead has a “color”. Doesn’t that make us all persons of color?
Sorry for the sidebar... back to your regularly scheduled thread.
Thanks, Pony Soldier. I used that term because that is the way she and the MSM describe her, similar to calling Obama, a black man, when he is a mulatto. I agree with you.
You would be better served to ask, What is white, gentile, and anglo-saxon and throw in male as a bonus. What do you get? a male WASP.
Please explain how your question relates to the thread. Are you suggesting that only whites need apply to be President?
ramage wrote: After debate, the democrat party can not accuse the republicans of being the party of doddering old white millionaires who dodged the draft. They made a mistake in not allowing Tulsi Gabbard to participate. It would have meant that Bernie and Joe would not have had to speak so long , expose themselves and Tulsi would have provided a youthful female of color (relatively speaking) for the audience to watch. Her ideas are not out of line with most of Joe and Bernie's positions.
I agree with your post but take issue with the term “female of color”. I know it’s the new politically correct term, but it really grates me. Every person, living or dead has a “color”. Doesn’t that make us all persons of color?
Sorry for the sidebar... back to your regularly scheduled thread.
bolded.....the reason the white question was asked.
homeagain wrote: What does WHITE privilege me to you??
That has nothing to do with what they are talking about. Do you think a person's skin color should be the first thing you say when describing an individual human being?
Do you remember this guy? He was in the 1st democrat debate.
New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio explained to the peons why he’s allowed to go to the gym and you are not.
Mayor DeBlasio: “I do not for a moment think there was anything problematic because I knew the dynamics. And again, I have to stay healthy so I can make the decisions for the people of the city.”
Can you hold a political convention without delegates? Or do they just mail in their votes from "the great state of Maine, where the oceans are fertile and the lands robust".
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.