- Posts: 10757
- Thank you received: 139
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
towermonkey wrote: Yes, we are due for a recession. We should be poised to ride it out much better than the last one at least.[/quote
I believe the GLOBAL equation is something you have not considered......the landscape is
loaded with landmines......or perhaps a better visual would be dominoes dropping...jmo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
towermonkey wrote: Yes, we are due for a recession. We should be poised to ride it out much better than the last one at least.[/quote
I believe the GLOBAL equation is something you have not considered......the landscape is
loaded with landmines......or perhaps a better visual would be dominoes dropping...jmo.
www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/a-key-recession-...ned-in-12-years.html
RECESSION STARTING Q3...….warning signs are becoming MORE frequent and failing to heed them will be a fiasco.....jmo,but research is restating expectations.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
I recall you recently said the recession was going to start in Q2... is that like when people say the world is going to overheat in twelve years then say it again twelve years later? I'm sure we will be in a recession eventually, but I think it's much more likely when a Democrat like Sanders becomes president and decides to undo everything that is keeping this economy cruising.homeagain wrote:
towermonkey wrote: Yes, we are due for a recession. We should be poised to ride it out much better than the last one at least.[/quote
I believe the GLOBAL equation is something you have not considered......the landscape is
loaded with landmines......or perhaps a better visual would be dominoes dropping...jmo.
www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/a-key-recession-...ned-in-12-years.html
RECESSION STARTING Q3...….warning signs are becoming MORE frequent and failing to heed them will be a fiasco.....jmo,but research is restating expectations.
BTW, everything I say is my opinion and not copied words from some "journalist", so you can assume everything I say ends in JMO.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Rick wrote:
homeagain wrote:
I recall you recently said the recession was going to start in Q2... is that like when people say the world is going to overheat in twelve years then say it again twelve years later? I'm sure we will be in a recession eventually, but I think it's much more likely when a Democrat like Sanders becomes president and decides to undo everything that is keeping this economy cruising.homeagain wrote:
towermonkey wrote: Yes, we are due for a recession. We should be poised to ride it out much better than the last one at least.[/quote
I believe the GLOBAL equation is something you have not considered......the landscape is
loaded with landmines......or perhaps a better visual would be dominoes dropping...jmo.
www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/a-key-recession-...ned-in-12-years.html
RECESSION STARTING Q3...….warning signs are becoming MORE frequent and failing to heed them will be a fiasco.....jmo,but research is restating expectations.
BTW, everything I say is my opinion and not copied words from some "journalist", so you can assume everything I say ends in JMO.
ACTUALLY my phrase was this ….Q2/Q3.... LAST part of Q2/into Q3.....THAT would place it into the JUNE/JULY timeframe...... Since you are questioning my stance, I will also put this out there......I gave March/APRIL as a timeframe for MUELLER report...the initial report
probably will hit everyones desk about 29th or AFTER......the FULL report will probably
be into APRIL/MAY......the timeframe of JUNE/.JULYis important because the information
will be FULLY viewed via subpoena …….SDNY is a key player,so that piece needs to fit into the calendar. JUNE/JULY is Q2/Q3 and IMPEACHMENT and a recession will be
occurring.....NOW, I have really roped myself in, haven't I???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
[/b]Rick wrote:
homeagain wrote:
I recall you recently said the recession was going to start in Q2... is that like when people say the world is going to overheat in twelve years then say it again twelve years later? I'm sure we will be in a recession eventually, but I think it's much more likely when a Democrat like Sanders becomes president and decides to undo everything that is keeping this economy cruising.homeagain wrote:
towermonkey wrote: Yes, we are due for a recession. We should be poised to ride it out much better than the last one at least.[/quote
I believe the GLOBAL equation is something you have not considered......the landscape is
loaded with landmines......or perhaps a better visual would be dominoes dropping...jmo.
www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/a-key-recession-...ned-in-12-years.html
RECESSION STARTING Q3...….warning signs are becoming MORE frequent and failing to heed them will be a fiasco.....jmo,but research is restating expectations.
BTW, everything I say is my opinion and not copied words from some "journalist", so you can assume everything I say ends in JMO.
ACTUALLY my phrase was this ….Q2/Q3.... LAST part of Q2/into Q3.....THAT would place it into the JUNE/JULY timeframe...... Since you are questioning my stance, I will also put this out there......I gave March/APRIL as a timeframe for MUELLER report...the initial report
probably will hit everyones desk about 29th or AFTER......the FULL report will probably
be into APRIL/MAY......the timeframe of JUNE/.JULYis important because the information
will be FULLY viewed via subpoena …….SDNY is a key player,so that piece needs to fit into the calendar. JUNE/JULY is Q2/Q3 and IMPEACHMENT and a recession will be
occurring.....NOW, I have really roped myself in, haven't I???
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.