Hydroxychloroquine WILL Save US

Here is the Wikipedia citation,

American Journal of Epidemiology
Discipline Public health, Medicine
Language English language
Edited by Enrique Schisterman
Publication details
Publisher
Oxford University Press for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (United States)
Frequency Semi-monthly
Impact factor
4.473 (2018)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4 Am. J. Epidemiol.
Indexing
ISSN 0002-9262 (print)
1476-6256 (web)
Links
Journal homepage
The American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) is a peer-reviewed journal for empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiological research. The current Editor-in-Chief is Dr. Enrique Schisterman.

Articles published in AJE are indexed by PubMed, Embase, and a number of other databases. AJE offers open access options for authors. It is published semi-monthly. Entire issues have been dedicated to abstracts from academic meetings (Society of Epidemiologic Research, North American Congress of Epidemiology), the history of the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),[1] the life of George W. Comstock,[2] and the celebration of notable anniversaries of schools of public health (University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health;[3] Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine;[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health).

AJE is currently ranked 5th in the field of epidemiology according to Google Scholar.[5] It has an impact factor of 4.473 (as of 2018) and the 5-year impact factor is 5.419 according to Journal Citation Reports.[6].

A medical journal does not place "peer-reviewed" on its masthead. Sorry to disappoint you. Perhaps you should include the AJE as one of your medical sources that you read. It would be edifying than techstartups.com. with regard to medical issues.

ramage wrote: Here is the Wikipedia citation,

American Journal of Epidemiology
Discipline Public health, Medicine
Language English language
Edited by Enrique Schisterman
Publication details
Publisher
Oxford University Press for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (United States)
Frequency Semi-monthly
Impact factor
4.473 (2018)
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4 Am. J. Epidemiol.
Indexing
ISSN 0002-9262 (print)
1476-6256 (web)
Links
Journal homepage
The American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) is a peer-reviewed journal for empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiological research. The current Editor-in-Chief is Dr. Enrique Schisterman.

Articles published in AJE are indexed by PubMed, Embase, and a number of other databases. AJE offers open access options for authors. It is published semi-monthly. Entire issues have been dedicated to abstracts from academic meetings (Society of Epidemiologic Research, North American Congress of Epidemiology), the history of the Epidemic Intelligence Service of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),[1] the life of George W. Comstock,[2] and the celebration of notable anniversaries of schools of public health (University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health;[3] Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine;[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health).

AJE is currently ranked 5th in the field of epidemiology according to Google Scholar.[5] It has an impact factor of 4.473 (as of 2018) and the 5-year impact factor is 5.419 according to Journal Citation Reports.[6].

A medical journal does not place "peer-reviewed" on its masthead. Sorry to disappoint you. Perhaps you should include the AJE as one of your medical sources that you read. It would be edifying than techstartups.com. with regard to medical issues.

OPEN ACCESS OPTIONS FOR AUTHORS....bolded...what does that mean? Is "open access option"/peer reviewed or is it an opinion piece WITHOUT review? THAT makes a huge difference in
content of this article.

HA, you disappoint me. Of course, the article by Dr. Risch is an opinion.
Obviously you did not read it.

Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of epidemiology at the Yale University School of Medicine.
He is a member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Editors write opinion pieces, also known as editorials.

Now with information in mind, how does it make a huge difference in the content?

ramage wrote: HA, you disappoint me. Of course, the article by Dr. Risch is an opinion.
Obviously you did not read it.

Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of epidemiology at the Yale University School of Medicine.
He is a member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of Epidemiology.

Editors write opinion pieces, also known as editorials.

SC can u define open access option? Is that SYNONYMOUS with peer reviewed? From my reading
of the phrase, it is NOT peer reviewed,but rather an opinion, which has not been verified by the med.
experts in the field.....and is allowed to be presented in a POV article.

HA, is this your attempt at humor? Editorials/opinion pieces are just that; a statement of one's view supported by evidence. By definition if an editorial/opinion piece were to be "peer reviewed" what would result is the opinion of that "peer". An opinion is not verified.
What I do find humous is "med experts in the field"

Harvey Risch, M.D., Ph.D., is a professor of epidemiology at the Yale University School of Medicine.
He is a member of the Board of Editors of the American Journal of Epidemiology, he is an author of more than 300 original research publications in the medical literature,

If he is not a "med expert", I am curious to see what you consider a "med expert", please enlighten me.

From zerohedge.com 6/3/20 In reference to the resumption of the HCQ study.

World Health Organization (WHO)
✔
@WHO
"On the basis of the available mortality data, the members of the committee recommended that there are no reasons to modify the trial protocol"-@DrTedros #COVID19

28
10:05 AM - Jun 3, 2020

So today Lancet says one of the anti Hydro studies is very suspect. This angers me. Why does everything have to be political?

FredHayek wrote: So today Lancet says one of the anti Hydro studies is very suspect. This angers me. Why does everything have to be political?

BECAUSE there is NO UNDERSTANDING of this present medical condition....AGAIN, it is 52 card P.U.....I
just has a conversation with a triage nurse.....about protocol,the present info,the process that is being
used to work the problem...her EXACT WORDS..."no one really knows"....from the horses mouth.

The reality of the virus is this..we are stuck with-it till there herd immunity....the promised vaccine MAY
work,but since it is being PUSHED THRU without due diligence...there is a question of IF it will work and
for what period of time....NJMO