- Posts: 6722
- Thank you received: 72
outdoor338 wrote: wayne, bennet made it very clear he didn't want obama near him...obama is toxic..
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0910/41887.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/0 ... 09770.html
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Viking wrote:
Something the Dog Said wrote:
The Viking wrote: So here is a question for all you Liberals who are upset that a group like the Tea party stepped up to do what you wanted your Dems to do. You keep saying they are a Republican offshoot. I don't agree. They represent all the Americans who are upset with the big out of control spending government. You Libs keep saying like you did under Bush that you want smaller government, less spending, smaller deficit, less government control. Now a party comes out that does that and you hate them.
So my question is this. Other than all of your whining about the way things are, what have you or the Democratic party done to change things? You elect the same people over and over who are creating the problems. Where is your 'Tea Party' type people who are actually doing something to change things? All you do is whine and complain but you don't have the courage to vote out the problem. You keep voting in the same problems. Like Bennet. You will vote for him just because he has a 'D' behind his name even though he voted for all this spending that didn't work and helped create the problem and our huge deficit. You dont really want change, you just want power and control.
Look in Nevada. You have Reid, the leader of this mess who has a approval rating under 20% yet almost 50% are thinking of voting for him. Really? So 30% of the Dems and whoever else votes for him is not happy with him and whines about change but yet they are going to vote him back in for 6 more years? That is pathetic. That is why the Democratic party has become pathetic! They whine but don't have the balls or backbone to change anything. At least we will vote out a piece of crap like Castle in DE even if it means we might not win that seat. I would rather have 35 solid fiscally responsible Republicans as a base and build from there rather than having 50 big spending Democrat looking Republicans.
How many Tea Party candidates ran in the Democratic primaries? I am thrilled with the Tea Party. They provide the best chance for the Democrats to win.
Thank you for making my point. That line just proves that you are one who just wants to keep voting in the same people with no change. So I guess we won't take you serious anymore when you complain about things in this country. You don't have the courage to vote for people who want to change it. You just want to complain about things then revote in the same idiots who are driving us to bankruptcy.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.........Albert Einstein
You could change the word Insanity for Stupidity and it would work too. You Dems just keep up the whining and by Albert Einstein's defenition, 'The Insanity'. As for me and many of Americans, most of whom are supporting the Tea party, we are not just talk. We are doing something about it and voting in the change that most all of America wants including most of the Dems although they are too far brainwashed to know it or admit it. But don't worry, we are working on fixing things for you. You just keep voting in the Reids and Pelosis of the world and see how that works out for you. :bash
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: I think we should have a Pro-Masturbation Rally in D.C.! Hrrumph! That'll show 'em...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
That will stink more than the politics there does...LadyJazzer wrote: I think we should have a Pro-Masturbation Rally in D.C.! Hrrumph! That'll show 'em...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nmysys wrote: Have we established the premise of this topic or has it changed to LJ's topic. Just because O'Donnell brought it up doesn't make it the subject of the topic. Do we all agree that there is a huge difference? Duh!!!!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
That is a "not-political" topic...Whatever she said, it was made in a religious context in accordance with her "christian" beliefs...Try doing that to ******** or any other group these days. Nobody would dare. Any hoopla about this is leftist hate tactics meant to deflect from the issues at hand (not a play on words ).Wayne Harrison wrote: Here is one of the things that troubles Karl Rove about O'Donnell. She's anti-masturbation.
[/youtube:3jfsems6]
I thought the Tea Party was all about getting OUT of people's personal lives.
[youtube:3jfsems6]
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.