Vice Lord wrote: There is an anomaly in the voting pattern..One that very rarely occures in legitimate elections..Take it from me, I know theres something fishy going on here
No there isn't the people who wanted you in just voted early. Not a big deal. There is nothing to be ashamed of losing to Science Chic. She is a great lady and a great asset to this site.
Plus you have thrown several tantrums in the last few pages that I am sure turned off a lot of voters towards having you represent this site. Not to mention the way you have belittled and treated many people on here. People don't forget. Science Chic has always been totally respectful of everyone. The differences are very clear.
I've been honest..Isn't that worth anything?
Throwing a tantrum and saying that you are going to quit the site if you lose is not worth a lot? You shouldn't quit over this race. You add a lot of comedy relief to this site. Sicence Chic is just a better representative for this site.
The votes just keep pouring in for Science Chic. 23-14-5 now. Thanks everyone. :thumbsup: You won't be disappointed having her as this sites representative.
Definition
of REPRESENTATIVE
1: serving to represent
2a : standing or acting for another especially through delegated authority b : of, based on, or constituting a government in which the many are represented by persons chosen from among them usually by election
3: serving as a typical or characteristic example
VL?
Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley
Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy
Thats what were trying to find out...I suspect multiple Viking log ons
Actually I think we need to investigate how you got 16 votes. CG can you look into that for us? That seems like a very inflated number for VL. Even if CG brought in 10 of those votes, are you telling me VL had 6 people vote for him over Science Chic?
