CinnamonGirl wrote: He isn't his team is. They have a damn good running game.
The Bears have a very poor offensive line, and take it from someone that played 6 years and coached 7 winning two Carnation bowls...the offensive line is EVERYTHING in football.
Okay, here you go. When you become a franchise QB you stay loyal. I am consistent in that across the board. I think what GB did to Farve was the same thing. If Elway told Bowlen tomorrow that he wanted to suit up and play he would let him. A franchise QB is loyal to the team and the team is loyal back. If you do not have that kind of commitment you won't be a franchise QB. Look at all the ones that don't stay from the beginning.
You put yourself in alot of danger of not ever becoming a franchise QB by getting yourself traded. If you don't have that loyalty then you have to really prove yourself. It is true. He is a f ing idiot to do what he did. For himself as well. He proved to Chicago that he is not a loyal guy. Coming in from the beginning in the QB position is what makes you a franchise QB. Just the way it is. I can give you a ton of examples. Start moving around and you will never be great.
The Bears have a very poor offensive line, and take it from someone that played 6 years and coached 7 winning two Carnation bowls...the offensive line is EVERYTHING in football.
Of course it is. What do you think I am dumb? But having a mobile QB makes a ton of difference. Their special teams have been playing lights out as well. But Cutler does not throw nearly as much as he did here.
Get to Cutler: Cutler has done an excellent job of playing within himself, but his history of risk-taking is well-known, and Green Bay is excellent at getting to quarterbacks and forcing bad decisions. Chicago's protection, especially at tackle, is suspect. In the teams' two meetings, Green Bay had nine sacks. The Packers also recorded five last week, including two by Clay Matthews, who will line up all over the formation. Cutler can expect a lot of overload blitzes, including bringing Charles Woodson, with a lot of man coverage behind it. But the Packers are not a strict man-coverage defense; they vary their looks, coverages and personnel extremely well. Green Bay might be poised for a defensive score in this matchup.
Matchup to watch: Bears interior offensive line versus Packers DT B.J. Raji: The interior of the Bears' offensive line is stronger than at tackle, but Chicago has a steep challenge this week. Raji has been fantastic. He rarely comes off the field, even though the Packers love to vary their defensive personnel. He can rush the passer with power and leverage and is very difficult to root out of the middle in the run game. Raji also runs very well and can make plays in pursuit. Getting him blocked is a must.
CinnamonGirl wrote: Get to Cutler: Cutler has done an excellent job of playing within himself, but his history of risk-taking is well-known, and Green Bay is excellent at getting to quarterbacks and forcing bad decisions. Chicago's protection, especially at tackle, is suspect. In the teams' two meetings, Green Bay had nine sacks. The Packers also recorded five last week, including two by Clay Matthews, who will line up all over the formation. Cutler can expect a lot of overload blitzes, including bringing Charles Woodson, with a lot of man coverage behind it. But the Packers are not a strict man-coverage defense; they vary their looks, coverages and personnel extremely well. Green Bay might be poised for a defensive score in this matchup.
Per Scouts Inc.
We are in the same division as the packers meaning we played the same teams..THE BEARS WON THE DIVISION..The game is in Chicago where we beat the packers, and we almost beat (10-3) them in week 17 up there when we had NOTHING to play for..Take the points..I'm telling you this as a friend, not as a competitor