CG et al, a process question before the thread spazzes out. The link I posted has a stock chart. I tried to embed it in my post but my normal process did not work. What is my problem? (even more ot: take shot if you are so inclined)
CinnamonGirl wrote: Dictator in chief just sign executive orders that make millions outlaws. Woo hoo.
Obama is racist, hundreds of minority school age kids are dying by gunfire every year in the inner city, but only when white suburban kids die does he do something about it.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I don't see any new laws there at all CG. What are you seeing? As far as I can tell, pretty commonsense stuff. I am pleasantly surprised. Maybe now all the gun ban hysteria can quiet down.
Martin Ent Inc wrote: What he really said is I want to spend more $$$. Even though he just got through telling people we have no money to pay blah blah blah.
And you won't find 23 law abiding citizens who will give a rats-ass about this.
chickaree wrote: I don't see any new laws there at all CG. What are you seeing? As far as I can tell, pretty commonsense stuff. I am pleasantly surprised. Maybe now all the gun ban hysteria can quiet down.
Okay, you are all correct. I amended my statement.
Just ask yourselves this question if all these new laws were in place a year ago, which if any of the recent shootings would have been stopped because of these laws? I know it feels good to feel like something is being done, especially when the president uses children as props, but unless the hundreds of millions of semi-auto guns are confiscated (good luck with that), what's going to change in a real way? I predict a sort of cash-for-clunkers program for guns that will be funded once again by law abiding taxayers and will have about the same effect as the failed clunker program. I think most people who own a scary looking "assault" rifle, know how much the value just went up and won't be satisfied with a couple hundred bucks and a pepper spray voucher. (Ya, I made that part up)
