Former top Afghanistan commander retired Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal wants those critical of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl not to rush to judgment before “we know the facts.”
“We don’t leave Americans behind. That’s unequivocal,” McChrystal said during a Yahoo News interview published Wednesday. McChrystal was commander of the International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan when Bergdahl disappeared in June 2009.
He also pushed Americans not to “judge” the soldier until all the facts are settled.
“One of the great things about America is we should not judge until we know the facts,” he said.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
OK, so the only reason Bergdahl doesn't count as a deserter is because he was captured before the 30 days was up by the Taliban? Pretty weak sauce you are bringing. Legally you are right, but it doesn't look the guy was just taking a three day bender in Kabul.ComputerBreath wrote: OK Guys...Bergdahl legally cannot be a deserter...EVER. You have to be AWOL for 30 days in a row before you are a deserter. We do not even know if his duty status was ever AWOL and if it was, he certainly was not AWOL for 30 consecutive days prior to being put into duty status POW/MIA.
Even if he was AWOL, that usually is not a court-martial offense. Unless they prove he was sabotaging the base or subverting his unit or spying for the Taliban.
IMO He may be charged with Article 15 offenses such as dereliction of duty or failure to follow orders and will be mustered out of the service.
I know from experience that if a military person doesn't fit in, they can and will be labeled by their co-workers and peers.
We do not know the whole story. We will likely not know the whole story...ever.
I am not defending Bergdahl and his actions...I am not defending what our President did. I am defending the system, knowing that it will take a while to get it all worked out.
Yes, I get angry when he is called a "deserter"...in some people's opinions he may be, but legally he is not. Period.
And I am getting more angry at people who don't know and who've never been anywhere near the military saying what our President did in getting him released was "stupid". We simply do not know the whole story.
Kinda reminds me of when Patricia Hearst was pardoned...I was very young but I remember the outrage about that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Something the Dog Said wrote: [spoiler:1g9aip2e][s:1g9aip2e]Once again Printsmith makes up bs and tries to pass it off as his "facts". For example, he claims that[/s:1g9aip2e][/spoiler:1g9aip2e] the " law" requiring 30 day notice for Gitmo transfers was passed by Democrats to prevent Bush from moving detainees. Even though the rule was only passed last year as part of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013. Or that when signing the Act, the President, just as Reagan and Bush repeatedly did, added a statement that the Act did not apply on situations where it violated his constitutional powers as commander in chief. Or that even Boehner has admitted that the President informed congressional leaders of the transfer of the detainees as early as December in exchange for the POW.
[s:1g9aip2e][spoiler:1g9aip2e]But hey why let the facts get in the way.[/spoiler:1g9aip2e][/s:1g9aip2e]
Now, any of the above hidden comments aren't worthy of The Ring, but the little snarky asides, snide comments, and indirect labeling, on top of not being able to tell tone and it being far too easy to take things personally all adds up to driving people away from participating. These posts aren't Ring worthy, unless we wanted to go all polly-anna-ish like some sites do, and make this place dull and boring and restrictive, where people fear to say anything in passion. If we can all (and yes, even I) make more of an effort with our own posts, the returns could be awesome - anyone game? :ThumbsUp:netdude wrote: Ugly rw partisan bs in thread [s:1g9aip2e][spoiler:1g9aip2e]kinda what I would have expected form some of the characters here...[/spoiler:1g9aip2e][/s:1g9aip2e]
Former top Afghanistan commander retired Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal wants those critical of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl not to rush to judgment before “we know the facts.”
“We don’t leave Americans behind. That’s unequivocal,” McChrystal said during a Yahoo News interview published Wednesday. McChrystal was commander of the International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan when Bergdahl disappeared in June 2009.
He also pushed Americans not to “judge” the soldier until all the facts are settled.
“One of the great things about America is we should not judge until we know the facts,” he said.
This is how true American's SHOULD respond...
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/s ... z33smqoay6
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: If he's legally right, then it isn't "weak"... Your Obama-Derangement-Syndrome spin doesn't change it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote: OK, so the only reason Bergdahl doesn't count as a deserter is because he was captured before the 30 days was up by the Taliban? Pretty weak sauce you are bringing. Legally you are right, but it doesn't look the guy was just taking a three day bender in Kabul.
Like charging someone with attempted murder but only because he was a horrible shot.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote:
LadyJazzer wrote: If he's legally right, then it isn't "weak"... Your Obama-Derangement-Syndrome spin doesn't change it.
Wouldn't that actually be Bergdahl derangement syndrome?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.