- Posts: 10318
- Thank you received: 65
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blazer Bob wrote: "It was not until the 2019-2020 release of classified footnotes (including the Danchenko interview and Steele’s depositions), as well as the FBI’s refutation of a key New York Times leak and its own inability to verify much of the dossier, that the anti-Trump sensational leaks were debunked — but not before the Times and the Washington Post won Pulitzer prizes for their coverage. The Trump administration now waits for media “mea culpas” that will never come. Being wrong, apparently, does not mean having to say you’re sorry."...
thehill.com/opinion/white-house/510635-s...reatest-russian-coup
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I don't think I've even seen your acknowledgement that the Russia investigation was highly tainted with lies and abuse by the higher up's in the FBI, DOJ, and WH.homeagain wrote:
Blazer Bob wrote: "It was not until the 2019-2020 release of classified footnotes (including the Danchenko interview and Steele’s depositions), as well as the FBI’s refutation of a key New York Times leak and its own inability to verify much of the dossier, that the anti-Trump sensational leaks were debunked — but not before the Times and the Washington Post won Pulitzer prizes for their coverage. The Trump administration now waits for media “mea culpas” that will never come. Being wrong, apparently, does not mean having to say you’re sorry."...
thehill.com/opinion/white-house/510635-s...reatest-russian-coup
bolded...THAT'S rich with irony....the king blames everyone, and NEVER TAKES responsibility.
SDNY is doing a straight up job of collecting/verifying and compiling FACTS OF CORRUPTION
WATCH WHAT HAPPENS
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
[/b]Pony Soldier wrote: And that’s as close to an admission that you’ll ever see from any on the left. “Well, both sides are rotten”. It’s intellectually dishonest and not even worthy of debate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
[/b]Pony Soldier wrote: And that’s as close to an admission that you’ll ever see from any on the left. “Well, both sides are rotten”. It’s intellectually dishonest and not even worthy of debate.
I don't care about the "debate"....I care about the TRUTH...what I posted is NOT dishonest or deflective,it
is the TRUTH.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
homeagain wrote:
[/b]Pony Soldier wrote: And that’s as close to an admission that you’ll ever see from any on the left. “Well, both sides are rotten”. It’s intellectually dishonest and not even worthy of debate.
I don't care about the "debate"....I care about the TRUTH...what I posted is NOT dishonest or deflective,it
is the TRUTH.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Pony Soldier wrote:
homeagain wrote:
[/b]Pony Soldier wrote: And that’s as close to an admission that you’ll ever see from any on the left. “Well, both sides are rotten”. It’s intellectually dishonest and not even worthy of debate.
I don't care about the "debate"....I care about the TRUTH...what I posted is NOT dishonest or deflective,it
is the TRUTH.
Sorry but that’s just lazy. Stating that something is the truth but that you won’t debate it shuts down discussion and leaves walls up to understanding. I will continue to debate because I try not to deal in absolutes. I see things a certain way and you see things differently. I am likely right some of the time while you are likely right others. (Of course, I am right more than you...)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.