- Posts: 2247
- Thank you received: 73
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
5th Amendment?koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blazer Bob wrote:
koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
AND WOULDN'T THAT BE GREAT. Kinda odd though that you want to compel his speech at the same time you are suppressing it.
Thanks for the laugh though..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote:
5th Amendment?koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
koobookie wrote:
Blazer Bob wrote:
koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
AND WOULDN'T THAT BE GREAT. Kinda odd though that you want to compel his speech at the same time you are suppressing it.
Thanks for the laugh though..
But of course, as we all know, he is not having his speech suppressed. .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Blazer Bob wrote:
koobookie wrote:
Blazer Bob wrote:
koobookie wrote: It just occurred to me that since Trump is now a private citizen, he could be compelled to testify at his impeachment trial.
AND WOULDN'T THAT BE GREAT. Kinda odd though that you want to compel his speech at the same time you are suppressing it.
Thanks for the laugh though..
But of course, as we all know, he is not having his speech suppressed. .
There are not enough ROTFLMAO in the world to react to that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
FredHayek wrote: He is banned off Twitter while Iranian despots who promise death to Israel still have their accounts. Jack Dorsey is more sympathetic to worldwide exporters of terrorism and religious autocrats that an elected leader who received 74 million votes in November. Same with Zuckerberg and Facebook.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
koobookie wrote:
FredHayek wrote: He is banned off Twitter while Iranian despots who promise death to Israel still have their accounts. Jack Dorsey is more sympathetic to worldwide exporters of terrorism and religious autocrats that an elected leader who received 74 million votes in November. Same with Zuckerberg and Facebook.
How is that restricting his free speech? Twitter is a private company that is under no obligation to provide a platform for anyone.
Again, Trump can call a press conference, he can release a statement to the media, he can give a speech, he can give an interview, he can write a book, he can stand on a street corner and yell into the wind. His free speech has not been suppressed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.