Impeachment proceedings against Trump

To answer your questions Rick, all you have to do is look back through the sources of what I've posted here and in the American Intelligence & Election Hacking topic. I don't trust entire media organizations, I trust individual people who've demonstrated that what they've written is credible, well-researched, and come to pass because as I've mentioned in a previous post, there are journalists who've been compromised and are reportedly under investigation by the SCO too (supposedly including Lewandowski, Hannity, Bannon, & Alex Jones to name a few). The New York Times, for example, has had both good in-depth articles and shallow, partisan hack pieces. Same for the Wall St Journal, Wash Post, MSNBC, and CNN. Shep Smith on FOX makes me smile sometimes.

The people I trust most: SpicyFiles/SpicerLies (she's like my scientist twin but for law), Natasha Bertrand, Molly McKew, Ale Vaughn, John Schindler, Renato Mariotti, Counterchekist, Caroline O., Louise Mensch, Sarah Smith. Note that this doesn't mean that I blindly believe every word they say or agree 100% with everything they say, but for the most part, they seem to have the knowledge, most credible sources, and/or do the in-depth reporting that I like to see.

On the title of this thread: I've explained multiple times that it's a fact that articles of impeachment have been filed against Trump. That is a fact. Whether they will be followed through remains to be seen based on what comes of this investigation. Let me ask you: if there is indeed video of him raping a 13 year old girl, or proof that he's been involved in human trafficking, would you finally then repudiate him? He's already admitting to groping women without consent, has 5 kids by 3 different wives and cheated on them all, possibly been involved in attempts to pay off porn stars to keep them quiet about affairs, refused to release his tax returns and kept his business holdings in a clear conflict of interest...what would finally cross your line on supporting this amoral, spoiled, narcissistic, greedy blowhard?

Once upon a time you said you were hoping that they'd release both Nunes and the Democratic response memo, they are both out - did you get a chance to read through them both? What did you think?

FH, the Special Counsel's investigation has found something - lots of something. 19 indictments and several guilty plea deals later, and even more sealed indictments waiting. Louise Mensch has stated that Trump and his family are already indicted, and her track record is getting pretty impressive.

If they continue to go after the smaller fish first, and get some of them to become informants, then they can use their evidence and testimony rather than blowing the cover on classified material and undercover agents. That's why this is taking so long, that plus there are hundreds of people being investigated and multiple crimes having been committed. It's not that they haven't found evidence of "collusion" (conspiracy, really), it's that they are conducting a thorough and professional investigation following the evidence, not public opinion. Have you not noticed that there are no leaks from Mueller's team? Any news we hear comes from leaks in the White House and Congress, people there who are contacted and from whom info is requested.

Blazer Bob wrote:

ScienceChic wrote: this amoral, spoiled, narcissistic, greedy blowhard

Thanks for telling us what you really think but what about that makes him different than most presidents.

They weren't traitors working for the enemy.