Of course, so many people would like to project shock and horror after hearing the "n-word", as it is now referred to in colloquial expression, but we know better. An untold number of Whites and certainly Blacks hear and use that word, in usually private settings, every day. So for this editorial, we can dispense with perpetuating that charade.
Oh well, maybe we are just making too much of this and are being too hard on Tony Snow. And maybe we were off base to expect white liberals and Black Democrats to oppose Senator Byrd in a manner similar to that in which they opposed John Ashcroft. Or could it be that we were wrong to think that the use of the word "n*gger" by the most respected man in the US Senate (in the opinion of many) would have sparked a fierce public debate?
* I censored my own post!
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/699107/posts Posted on Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:47:09 PM by TLBSHOW
BYRD LANDS
West Virginia's Senior Senator Robert Byrd (D-KKK), the man paid $10-a-piece for each new Klu Klux Klan member he recruited and who uses the taboo "N-word" even now, is trying to use the terror war for pork. He's set to bring pork back to his state for things that have nothing to do with protecting the homeland - and he's not alone.
Ok, Nevermind, Looks like somebody has already ended the debate, that I took as one saying that American is still ractist, but worse in some parts of the country, and the other was trying to say your incorrect...
Am I getting this correct? or did I miss something in the usual name calling from one when they can't prove their point?
My point as if it matters now, is that is/was the democraps that are always looking at color,(and getting away with it), NOT the Right-Thinkers.
major bean wrote: You, sir, are a liar and further communication with you will cease.
TPP wrote: Ok, Nevermind, Looks like somebody has already ended the debate
Yes, they did. They do that when they can't hold up their side of a debate.
No, that is done whenever someone demonstrates that they blatantly lied about a post that they made. Please go back and read it. it was not about the debate but rather about fabricating quotes.
Nobody that matters, how would you have responded to someone who fabricated quotes and then denied that they said what could clealy be shown as their statement? Huh?
