A new Board? Any interest?

chickaree wrote: Akilina, if you were my kid I'd put you in the corner. You have been told numerous times that the way you address LadyJazzer is rude, yet you excuse yourself and continue. At this point it seems that you and LadyJazzer are equals for bringing down the caliber of discussion here. Is that really how you want to be perceived?

No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude. I've been told and now understand that a has been journalist or no one is to have their name changed even though it isn't part of TOS. So I won't use their name I will leave it out. We have TOS and then we have some recently stated regulations that have gone into effect.

The whole point being is that it is thoroughly confusing cuz I don't know where to look for any newly founded regs as opposed to TOS and the courthouse will just continue as it has. I haven't seen any improvement and doubt there will be any self moderation. But I have a much better clarification of how things are supposed to work, maybe. I will continue to use those who have been here the longest with the most posts as models as to what I should as a newer member should expect.

Came back to add that I reported some posts for violations yesterday and was given information that said they weren't violations even though it violated the TOS and I relied on it in posting in the Courthouse thereafter. I was following what I understood to be appropriate.

akilina wrote: a has been journalist

akilina wrote: No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude

:faint:

akilina wrote:

chickaree wrote: Akilina, if you were my kid I'd put you in the corner. You have been told numerous times that the way you address LadyJazzer is rude, yet you excuse yourself and continue. At this point it seems that you and LadyJazzer are equals for bringing down the caliber of discussion here. Is that really how you want to be perceived?

No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude. I've been told and now understand that a has been journalist or no one is to have their name changed even though it isn't part of TOS. So I won't use their name I will leave it out. We have TOS and then we have some recently stated regulations that have gone into effect.

The whole point being is that it is thoroughly confusing cuz I don't know where to look for any newly founded regs as opposed to TOS and the courthouse will just continue as it has. I haven't seen any improvement and doubt there will be any self moderation. But I have a much better clarification of how things are supposed to work, maybe. I will continue to use those who have been here the longest with the most posts as models as to what I should as a newer member should expect.

Came back to add that I reported some posts for violations yesterday and was given information that said they weren't violations even though it violated the TOS and I relied on it in posting in the Courthouse thereafter. I was following what I understood to be appropriate.

Jeez, quit being such a baby. I don't envy you this SC. There's always one or two. I think they are the same ones on every board...

Photo-fish wrote:

akilina wrote: a has been journalist

akilina wrote: No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude

:faint:

Sorry I followed the feedback that I received in a private message about others who called other people names weren't in violation. I am trying to follow the rules that I clearly don't understand.

akilina wrote:

chickaree wrote: Akilina, if you were my kid I'd put you in the corner. You have been told numerous times that the way you address LadyJazzer is rude, yet you excuse yourself and continue. At this point it seems that you and LadyJazzer are equals for bringing down the caliber of discussion here. Is that really how you want to be perceived?

No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude. I've been told and now understand that a has been journalist or no one is to have their name changed even though it isn't part of TOS. So I won't use their name I will leave it out. We have TOS and then we have some recently stated regulations that have gone into effect.

The whole point being is that it is thoroughly confusing cuz I don't know where to look for any newly founded regs as opposed to TOS and the courthouse will just continue as it has. I haven't seen any improvement and doubt there will be any self moderation. But I have a much better clarification of how things are supposed to work, maybe. I will continue to use those who have been here the longest with the most posts as models as to what I should as a newer member should expect.

Came back to add that I reported some posts for violations yesterday and was given information that said they weren't violations even though it violated the TOS and I relied on it in posting in the Courthouse thereafter. I was following what I understood to be appropriate.

Oh well, I guess this is your way of saying that yes, that is the way you want others to see you. So much for giving others the benefit of the doubt.

akilina wrote: Sorry I followed the feedback that I received in a private message about others who called other people names weren't in violation. I am trying to follow the rules that I clearly don't understand.

Just be respectful. What is so hard to understand about that?

towermonkey wrote:

akilina wrote:

chickaree wrote: Akilina, if you were my kid I'd put you in the corner. You have been told numerous times that the way you address LadyJazzer is rude, yet you excuse yourself and continue. At this point it seems that you and LadyJazzer are equals for bringing down the caliber of discussion here. Is that really how you want to be perceived?

No I haven't been told that the way I address some hijacker is rude. I've been told and now understand that a has been journalist or no one is to have their name changed even though it isn't part of TOS. So I won't use their name I will leave it out. We have TOS and then we have some recently stated regulations that have gone into effect.

The whole point being is that it is thoroughly confusing cuz I don't know where to look for any newly founded regs as opposed to TOS and the courthouse will just continue as it has. I haven't seen any improvement and doubt there will be any self moderation. But I have a much better clarification of how things are supposed to work, maybe. I will continue to use those who have been here the longest with the most posts as models as to what I should as a newer member should expect.

Came back to add that I reported some posts for violations yesterday and was given information that said they weren't violations even though it violated the TOS and I relied on it in posting in the Courthouse thereafter. I was following what I understood to be appropriate.

Jeez, quit being such a baby. I don't envy you this SC. There's always one or two. I think they are the same ones on every board...

Thanks TM I see you have been here for awhile and I so appreciate your very mature and reasonable response. You won't mind if I use it in other posts huh?

towermonkey wrote: ... President Obama is our president, like it or not, and the respect is for the office, not the man.

OK, I will respect the office, desk and chair. Him, not so much.
J/K

Photo-fish wrote: Just be respectful. What is so hard to understand?

Ok I will start when you start. Fair enough? I also expect that you will call others out who have been way out there, won't mention any names.

I am seriously appreciating the discussion.

I know you have to jump on one person which proves to me that you can't do it with respect or reasonably either and that more than likely I am wasting my time. Kahlas or whatever it is that BB, ooops sorry BaileyBud, has for his signature.