Who do you want in the Oval Office in 2017?

23 Jul 2016 06:23 #21 by ThuenteDL
As one who has raised two respectable loving caring adults, I believe kids are a reflection of the parents, and you can't fake good kids. The Trump kids are a great reflection of the values instilled in them by Trump.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2016 08:18 #22 by FredHayek
No more Clinton's, America is a representative democracy, not a dynasty.

ThuenteDL wrote: I want Trump. Not because he was my first, second, third, fourth or fifth preference, but because he is the only hope of preventing the Clintons from getting in the White House again. Someone who can look at the parents/ loved ones of four dead Americans over their caskets and tout a video was to blame, just to save Obamas narrative at re-election time has a soul so stained black that I pity our country if she is elected. Never Hilary!


Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2016 10:33 #23 by Something the Dog Said

ThuenteDL wrote: I want Trump. Not because he was my first, second, third, fourth or fifth preference, but because he is the only hope of preventing the Clintons from getting in the White House again. Someone who can look at the parents/ loved ones of four dead Americans over their caskets and tout a video was to blame, just to save Obamas narrative at re-election time has a soul so stained black that I pity our country if she is elected. Never Hilary!


Politico fact checked the allegations by Patricia Smith that SOS Clinton personally told her the video was to blame for the attacks in Benghazi. This is what they found:

Patricia Smith told CNN on Oct. 10, 2012, that at the Joint Base Andrews meeting, National Security Adviser Susan Rice "talked to me personally, and she said this is the way it was. It was because of this film that came out."

Not Clinton, Susan Rice. But then a year later:

Speaking at a House hearing about a year later, Smith expanded on that, saying that Clinton, President Barack Obama, Rice and others, all individually told her the attack stemmed from the video.

So the story changed a year later to that not only Susan Rice blamed the video but also SOS Clinton and President Obama and others told her the video was to blame. If that actually happened, then why did she say immediately after the meeting that only Rice blamed the video.

One other individual at the meeting has said that Clinton appeared to blame the filmmaker, but all of the other family members and other individuals present denied that Clinton made any such remarks blaming the video. Further, in public remarks after the meeting, SOS Clinton made no mention of the video.

Politico concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support whether or not SOS Clinton made remarks blaming the attacks on the video personally to the family members, but even if she did, that was not a lie as the intelligent reports at that time claimed that the video may have played a role in the attacks.

www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article...-about-clinton-and-/


So you are basing your vote for POTUS solely on a disputed allegation that is unsupported by others present, that was made a year after the meeting and were completely altered from remarks made contemporaneous with the meeting. Right.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2016 13:45 #24 by Arlen
So, you also call Patricia Smith a liar. How shameful.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

23 Jul 2016 17:33 #25 by Arlen
Here is the link. Listen to Patricia Smith and then tell me that she is lying.
Patricia Smith at the RNC

Then listen to Hillary Clinton and tell me that she is "truth" incarnate.
HIllary's explanation

The contrast is stark.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jul 2016 00:35 #26 by hillfarmer
If you support Trump you are truly ready for the abyss. Read your history instead of listening to only the right wing press. Trump is an erie echo of Hitler. His speech the other night could have been written by Adolph, focusing on conspiracies, fear and malevolence. He is the dark night of our country fanning our fears and bigotry.

The only rational choice of the two is Hillary.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jul 2016 09:49 #27 by Arlen
In every election, the liberals yell "Hitler!". Listen to yourself and realize that you are running on fear. The liberals say that Republicans stir the voters by using fear tactics and then they yell "Hitler!"

My goodness, wake up to yourself. Realize what you are saying and fight the irrational fears that you have.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jul 2016 10:06 - 24 Jul 2016 10:08 #28 by Blazer Bob

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jul 2016 10:06 #29 by ramage
With the DNC in collaboration with the Clinton campaign discussing how to best denigrate Sanders because of him being a Jew, I think that you have equated Hitler with the wrong candidate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

24 Jul 2016 13:13 #30 by ramage
I wanted to re-read my history before posting. I can say with 100% confidence that Adolph Hitler did not have a Jewess introduce him at the penultimate gathering of the National Socialist Party (Nazi Party). Nor did Hitler have 3 Jewish grandchildren and a son-in-law who is an Orthodox Jew.

Why don't you try Mussolini or Tojo. Perhaps Mussolini would be best as the New York Times, Salon.cm, etc. have already made the comparison of Mussolini with Trump. Even they discount the Hitler comparison. By the way which History books are you reading?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.175 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+