PLAN B.....blantant illusion

The comment section of WSJ.COM makes the subscription worthwhile. For example, a comment on their front page article reporting on the apparent deal with Musk

"News Flash! Twitter foils Musk's takeover attempt by adding Hunter Biden to the Board for $60,000 a month."

LOL!!

www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/0...I1L3R3aXR0ZXItZWxvbi

The company’s board of directors met with Musk on Sunday, and negotiations extended into the early hours of Monday, according to a person familiar with the negotiations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions. The two sides were focused on determining whether Musk had the financing to complete the acquisition, and did not spend much time discussing Musks’s strategy for the future of the social network, the person said.

The deal, expected to be announced by the market’s close on Monday, raises thorny questions about how the outspoken billionaire could put his stamp on a platform widely used by celebrities, politicians, activists and state leaders alike

I'd love to be a fly on the wall when Musk hands walking papers to the censorship board. Buh bye!!

It is a done deal. Trading has halted in TWTR.
Musk is the new owner, An African-American no less.

Google Fires Republican Engineer Who Exposed Alleged Bias Against Conservatives - Report

www.westernjournal.com/google-fires-repu...onservatives-report/

Audit suggests Google favors a small number of major outlets

www.cjr.org/tow_center/google-news-algorithm.php

Here's The Evidence That Google's Search Results Are Horribly Biased

www.businessinsider.com/evidence-that-go...-biased-2014-10?op=1

Is Google biased against conservatives? The short answer is not likely.

Based on our data-driven study, we found that 63% of Google’s search results were non-partisan. While 32% of the results came from left-leaning publications versus 5% of results coming from right-leaning websites.

www.gotchseo.com/google-biased/

Edit: Results from first page of duck duck go Search term "proof that google is biased"

Run the same search on Google.

Irony: Elon Musk got the money to buy Twitter from Tesla buyers. Plus the environmentalists in Federal and State governments who gave tax breaks to the rich people who bought EV's.

SC, your media is any source that refused to do any kind of investigative reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop. It's any media source that didn't do any extensive stories on the corrupt hierarchy of the FBI that knowingly used a fake document to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen. I could make a very long list of important stories that your sources likely ignored but that's not the subject of this thread. If you'd like to start another one of those, I'd gladly play and challenge you story by story.

While it's true that I was not happy about the taxpayers subsidizing upper middle class and wealthy people so they could buy an EV, that doesn't equate to me not liking Musk... he just took advantage of the policy created by the government. If I had any bad feelings toward Musk, it was more about his views on climate change that suggested his cars could save us, which is laughable when you look at the environmental damage caused by all the alternative energy sources and the materials needed for the billions of batteries we would need. He's not the only guy I've disagreed with but later respected because of more important issues, and I see nothing wrong with that since I've had those same feelings about individuals in my life.

Free speech is so much more important to this country than electric vehicles that are mostly powered by fossil fuels, indirectly but that statement is 100% factual.

So please, lets talk about what you think is so bad about what Musk has done with Twitter and maybe we can find a little agreement. Maybe we need to let this play out before you condemn him for having some sort of bad intentions.