posteryoyo wrote: Cannot we just send our kids to school to learn academics and keep religion at home? Just seems odd that parents and community members are ok with this investment. People are getting their homes and land taken away to support the schools and public services....over 1000 a year in park...Carols can happen at home, not because they cannot happen at school, but I don't want pay for it...once all kids graduate able to do algebra, let alone multiplication, then we can propose to have a conversation about carols and new 60 million dollar building investments.
Really if the kinds cannot learn math, should we really be taking that precious childhood and brain space up with public singing of religious songs. Was it not tradition to make sacrafices in many early versions of christianity? We did not keep doing that? Perhaps we can let the schools focus on learning usefull things for the future...that is why the community members are forced to share their hard earned wealth with threat of loosing you HOME.
Again, you are debating the wrong issue. If you cannot instill your religion in your kinds because you are too busy, don't push that to the schools too. They cannot afford it or do it right.
So are you OK with them taking time out of teaching al of the academic classes which as you say, they clearly need more of, to teach them sex education, how to put a condom on a banana, a class on tollerence of homosexuals, and have them read books like 'Heather has two mommies'? Especially when many parents don't want all of that taught to their kids? Or is it just singing Christmas Carols that you don't want taking away from academics?
What kind of looser of parent lets the schools beat them to sex ed. That is a parent's job...gee the consequences are there.
Tolerance of homosexuals...tolerance of the excessively religious...tolerance of stupid people....nope....all morals...all meant for the home. Though I am tolerant, the school atmosphere does not breed tolerance, that is why you need to teach kids these good things at home.
Gee, I would not even have public schools. Maybe require education and have help for the poor, but not this you get to make whoopie for 10 minutes and get $100k of support from the community with no financial need or proof there of.
So no carols, no morals, no singing, so sex lessons, just learn math and get those kids out ready to learn and work more. That is their job. If a kid cannot cooperate, tell the parents, chance 2, get rid of the kid because the parents have not prepped him for school yet, let him try again in a year.
Gee look at my spelling, and I have not touched a condom in well over 2 decades...clearly more is needed. But I have no kids and I am successfull.
Why do kids need sex ed, don't they have friends and porn, like we did?
What kind of looser of parent lets the schools beat them to sex ed. That is a parent's job...gee the consequences are there.
Tolerance of homosexuals...tolerance of the excessively religious...tolerance of stupid people....nope....all morals...all meant for the home. Though I am tolerant, the school atmosphere does not breed tolerance, that is why you need to teach kids these good things at home.
Gee, I would not even have public schools. Maybe require education and have help for the poor, but not this you get to make whoopie for 10 minutes and get $100k of support from the community with no financial need or proof there of.
So no carols, no morals, no singing, so sex lessons, just learn math and get those kids out ready to learn and work more. That is their job. If a kid cannot cooperate, tell the parents, chance 2, get rid of the kid because the parents have not prepped him for school yet, let him try again in a year.
Gee look at my spelling, and I have not touched a condom in well over 2 decades...clearly more is needed. But I have no kids and I am successfull.
Why do kids need sex ed, don't they have friends and porn, like we did?
Well at least you are consistent and I respect that.
